• 2023 Market Report
  • San Carlos Neighborhoods
    • Alder Manor
    • Beverly Terrace
    • Clearfield Park
    • Cordes
    • Howard Park
    • White Oaks
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Bob’s Production
  • Contact
  • Commitment to Mental Health Awareness
  • San Carlos Blog

  • 2023 Market Report
  • San Carlos Neighborhoods
    • Alder Manor
    • Beverly Terrace
    • Clearfield Park
    • Cordes
    • Howard Park
    • White Oaks
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Bob’s Production
  • Contact
  • Commitment to Mental Health Awareness

Surging San Carlos Market Highlights A Much Needed Change

April 9, 2013

An Uncomfortable Situation

The majority of San Carlos homes coming to market are the subject of extremely competitive multiple offer situations. The reality is that offers which include a property inspection contingency for the prospective buyer are finishing out of the running in many cases.  When you step back and really think about what these scenarios represent, it’s truly alarming.  You are being asked to buy a $1,000,000 home without having the ability to get some professional advice of your choosing regarding the condition of the home.  The fact is, we have become entirely immune to these types of purchases.  What would put the fear of god into buyers around the rest of the country, is just another day at the office for San Carlos buyers.  The San Carlos market is so out of whack with demand versus available inventory, that sellers are able to not only command record high prices, but they are able to push all of the risk of the transaction onto the buyer as well.  The scary part is that we seemingly cannot make any headway in even partially satisfying the demand.

A Mandatory Inspection Period

Whenever you have a situation that strikes you as completely unreasonable, such as purchasing a home without having the ability to inspect it, one thing is for sure:  the frequency of lawsuits will increase.  When I was still practicing law, the vast majority of our firm’s real estate matters involved disclosure issues.  Even though agents and sellers have buyers sign many disclaimers before giving up their right to a property inspection contingency, the situation itself still lends itself to higher than normal rates of potential litigation after the transaction is complete.  Many of the housing reform laws of 2008 and 2009 were completed on the federal level to protect against another major housing collapse.  It is time for the State of California to step in and localize some rules of their own in order to minimize the risk to our own housing market.  My one new addition to the Civil Code would be simple:  Mandate a property inspection contingency on behalf of the buyer in every residential purchase.

Why It Makes Sense

(1) The number of lawsuits will decrease with the mandatory inspection period.
(2) The buyer is more protected and receives a much more accurate picture of the true condition of the home.
(3) Finally, the sellers, themselves, will benefit from adding an additional layer of protection against liability.

In The Mean Time…

I would love to tell you that a change to our Civil Code is forthcoming, but the reality is that it is not on the immediate horizon.    In the mean time, there are several options available to buyers that can offer a somewhat suitable alternative to their own property inspection and give buyers another layer of liability coverage.  If you are currently in the San Carlos market, talk with your agent about some of these alternatives in order to better protect yourself.

Share

2013 San Carlos Real Estate  / Blog  / Featured  / Featured Blog Posts  / San Carlos Real Estate

Bob Bredel

2 Comments


Todd Ramming
April 9, 2013 at 6:49 pm
Reply

Hi Bob,
Another interesting article. I am still getting used to the new web site format. My question is if a buyer who makes an offer waives their right to sue for what an inspection could have uncovered. After all, it was the buyer, not the seller, who chose not to have an inspection.
Of course, the seller must disclose what they already know, but does the seller need to actively look for new problems? In other words, is an adequate reply to a disclosure lawsuit that the seller did not know about the problem? It would seem to me that the seller has a fairly low level of duty here.
One other idea for reducing these lawsuits is to make the buyer liable for the seller’s litigation costs if the buyer loses the lawsuit. I would think the buyer might also be liable for any damage done to the market value of the home or the cost of delays while taking the property off the market. What do you think?
Todd



Bob Bredel
April 9, 2013 at 8:06 pm
Reply

Hi Todd,
Thanks for your post. In California, someone waiving their right to sue over possible future issues is actually a fairly complex move. It would mandate some type of legal counsel.
Remember, the seller is obligated to disclose what they know and what the seller should have known with reasonable diligence and inquiry. Most sellers are not professional inspectors and are not held that particular standard.
Most of our standard contracts allow for the prevailing party to collect attorneys’ fees.
Thanks again for your comment.
Bob



Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • 2008-2023 SCEF Diamond Sponsor

    San Carlos Education Foundation

    Since 2008 I am proud to have donated auction items and cash totaling $300,000 to the San Carlos Education Foundation.
    Learn More
  • Subscribe

    Get it straight from the top! Bob Bredel is the #1 Realtor for total San Carlos sales volume 2008-2022. Never miss out on San Carlos news by getting our blog in your inbox. As an added bonus, receive quarterly real estate market reports.

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Ask Bob Bredel

    Bob Bredel

    Got a question about San Carlos or the real estate market? Bob can help.
    Contact Bob


  • Christie's International Real Estate Sereno

  • Contact

    Bob Bredel
    650-520-9343
    bob@bredelhomes.com

             

  • Address

    Christie’s International Real Estate Sereno
    662 Laurel Street, Suite A
    San Carlos, California 94070

  • Subscribe

    Subscribe to receive notifications when new posts are added to the San Carlos Blog.

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


  • © 2023 San Carlos Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • CalDRE: 01493564
Website by Style Agent

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}