• 2023 Market Report
  • San Carlos Neighborhoods
    • Alder Manor
    • Beverly Terrace
    • Clearfield Park
    • Cordes
    • Howard Park
    • White Oaks
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Bob’s Production
  • Contact
  • Commitment to Mental Health Awareness
  • San Carlos Blog

  • 2023 Market Report
  • San Carlos Neighborhoods
    • Alder Manor
    • Beverly Terrace
    • Clearfield Park
    • Cordes
    • Howard Park
    • White Oaks
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Bob’s Production
  • Contact
  • Commitment to Mental Health Awareness

Election Results Are In – Measure U Fails

November 4, 2009

The results are in and Measure U failed in San Carlos by a little more than 600 votes.  The city council will now be faced with the unenviable taskof making even deeper cuts into city services and costs.  Privately, some of the Measure U supporters will tell you that the vote was much closer than they had anticipated. Passing any type of tax increase, no matter what the overall benefit may be, is always a tough proposition, especially in a difficult economy. As has been the case recently in San Carlos, tax measures have failed the first time through, but tend to be successful on the second or third attempt.  This was the case with Measure S and the parcel tax.  I would not be surprised to see the sales tax hike back on a the ballot in the very near future.
As for city council, San Carlos has returned Bob Grassilli and Matt Grocott to the city council along with newcomer, Andy Klein.

Share

Uncategorized

Bob Bredel

8 Comments


Antonia Binetti
November 4, 2009 at 8:11 am
Reply

If the whole point of this was just to “set up a second or third attempt” at more taxes, then we can be sure that services will not be cut, and in fact only expanded to see the “crisis” be made even more dire. This, of course, runs completely contrary to the sound beating Measure U took — despite outspending the competition more than 5-1.
According to the San Mateo Daily Journal, Mayor Grassilli’s next steps are ‘figuring out why it failed and the effect on the city’s finances.’ Mr. Mayor, I’ll save you the trouble and tell you why it failed: your constituents believe that San Carlos has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. I hope you got the message.
And is anyone else a bit concerned that our Council didn’t even consider the possibility that the Measure might fail and have a plan accordingly? He’s only now going to look at the effect on city finances?
Bob, I agree with you that the Council will seek additional taxes. I also think that it misses the point of what this vote was. The sales tax has risen from 5% to 6% to 6.25% to 7.25% to 7.75% to 8.75% to 9.25% — but apparently it is never enough. Those of us who voted this down sent a clear message. Hopefully it will be heard.



LAURA
November 4, 2009 at 10:18 am
Reply

Hey everybody,
Call Matt Grocott if you need anything. Antonia we’ll call you too. You guys said you’d volunteer when services get cut. Get ready. Do you know CPR? Can you clear a sewer line? Do you have a set of tools? How about a hose to put out fires? Go get one. After all, The sales tax is still 9.25%!
Extreme cuts will happen. And folks will not be happy. They are not idle threats. Talk all you want. It’s action time. Trust me, the council got the message, and they will now implement the voters will. Be careful what you wish for. Because your wish is about to come true. Congratulations.



Antonia Binetti
November 4, 2009 at 11:37 am
Reply

If the City Council wishes to be punitive to the voters for rejecting their sales tax plan, then so be it — that is their choice. But no one’s house is going to burn because this Measure was defeated.
The silliest thing about this is that the City could have taken action earlier. Mark Weiss identified $800K in cuts in non-essential services back in May. (This was at that ‘town hall’ meeting where no one was allowed to speak.) But he didn’t make those cuts then because he wanted to ‘let the voters decide.’ OK, well, we decided. But if had made those choices back then then we’d be at least $400K ahead of the game now.



new to san carlos
November 6, 2009 at 2:32 am
Reply

Laura, please stop with the scare tactics. I’d like to see somebody’s house burn down “because the city council cut fire services.” Then there’d be some REAL outrage about management salaries, dontcha think?
And somebody pointed out on another blog that we already pay a sewer assessment. So, please explain why my sewer will back up and I’ll need to clear it myself (seriously – I don’t understand).
I started off sort of in favor of U. But all the comments I read turned me from a yea to a nay. Sorry.



LAURA
November 6, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Reply

Scare tactics? Really? The no voters are getting their way. City employees will get cut, salaries and benfits packages have to be renegotiated (by law) and that will take time. And as we tried to make clear in the campaign, services will get cut as well. So this isn’t “tactics”. This is reality. The council will now have to carry out what the voters supported. I’m sorry you think this is ALL about salaries; that’s what Grocott and his team focused on. And while it’s a valid issue, it’s not the only issue. Those who are involved in this community get that. I have volunteered and raised money for San Carlos for years. I will now have to do more of that. But make no mistake, having to cut services was explained and but the majority voted no anyway.



CPABOY
November 6, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Reply

I read on another comment on this site, that the San Carlos Parks and Rec commissioner makes 173K per year. Like other govt employees, I assume this includes pretty nice benefits as well.
Without knowing that person, does this seem reasonable? Seriously, what does the job entail? What are the requirements? Are there a lot a high pressure days as Parks and Rec commissioner of a 30K person city?
I am happy that measure U was defeated.



Bob Bredel
November 6, 2009 at 10:21 pm
Reply

Hi CPABOY,
I think if you researched the salaries of park and rec directors for most other towns of similar size, you would see similar salaries. I spent 3 years on the park and rec commission in San Carlos and I can tell you that the director’s job is more involved that it may seem on the surface. Additionally, knowing our former director quite well….I’m pretty sure he aged about 20 years over the 7 years that the synthetic turf issue was being bounced around San Carlos.
Bob



PR
November 10, 2009 at 11:40 am
Reply

Laura
I voted in favor of U but even so I understand the arguments made by the opponents to U as to the salary and bonus issue. I think it would have gone a long way if council members had presented a united front from the beginning and made a collective promise to either return the bonuses they most recently collected or to immediately enter contract re-negotiations in order to expedite a pay cut. I understand things don’t move as quickly outside the private sector, but those of us in it are all too acutely aware that survival of jobs and businesses requires swift, immediate and sometimes painful action. I do not for one minute believe that compensation cuts for the council would have solved the entire problem but what it may have done was sway enough of those opposed to the measure to come around and commit themselves to doing their part.



Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • 2008-2023 SCEF Diamond Sponsor

    San Carlos Education Foundation

    Since 2008 I am proud to have donated auction items and cash totaling $300,000 to the San Carlos Education Foundation.
    Learn More
  • Subscribe

    Get it straight from the top! Bob Bredel is the #1 Realtor for total San Carlos sales volume 2008-2022. Never miss out on San Carlos news by getting our blog in your inbox. As an added bonus, receive quarterly real estate market reports.

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Ask Bob Bredel

    Bob Bredel

    Got a question about San Carlos or the real estate market? Bob can help.
    Contact Bob


  • Christie's International Real Estate Sereno

  • Contact

    Bob Bredel
    650-520-9343
    bob@bredelhomes.com

             

  • Address

    Christie’s International Real Estate Sereno
    662 Laurel Street, Suite A
    San Carlos, California 94070

  • Subscribe

    Subscribe to receive notifications when new posts are added to the San Carlos Blog.

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


  • © 2023 San Carlos Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • CalDRE: 01493564
Website by Style Agent

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}